FOR FREE MATERIALS
- Introduction: OS
- Booting Process
- Command Interpreter
- Dual mode of operation
- System Calls
- Difference between system call and library call
- Interrupt and Trap
- Introduction
- Scheduling Criteria, Terms and Concepts
- Different Type Scheduling Algorithms
- Longest Job First
- Longest Remaining Time First
- Highest Response Ratio Next (HRRN)
- Priority Scheduling
- Least Completed Next (LCN) Scheduling
- Multi-Level Queue Scheduling
- Multilevel Feedback Queue Scheduling
- Guaranteed Scheduling
- Fair Share Scheduling
- Lottery Scheduling
- Multi-Processor Scheduling
- Deadline Scheduling
- Rate-Monotonic Scheduling
- POSIX Real-Time Scheduling
- Priority Inversion
- Proportional Share Scheduling
- Comparison table of Scheduling Algorithm
- Algorithm Evaluation for Scheduling
- Important concept of MM
- Memory Representation as Address
- Memory layout for a Process
- Logical and Physical Address Space
- Necessity of Memory Management
- Introduction
- Concept of Non-contiguous memory allocation
- Basic concept of Paging
- Address Translation
- Process of Paging Method
- Calculation of Offset for paging
- Calculation of Logical Address Bit and number of Pages
- Calculation of Physical Address Bit and number of Frames
- Calculation of Page Table Size
- Organization of MMU
- Why Page size power of 2
- Paging Address Calculation: example1
- Paging Numeric Problem: Example2
- Paging Address Calculation: Example3
- Paging Address Calculation: Question1
- Some Important Question 2
- Paging Address Translation: Question3
- UGC NET Paging Question
- GATE Paging Question
- Number of information at Page Entry
- Exams Question on Page Entry Information
- Exam Question: Page Entry Information
- Calculates Page Table Entry Size
- Calculates Page Size
- Calculation of Optimal Page Size
- Question on Optimal Page Size
- Hashed Page Table with Example
- Inverted Page Table with Gate Question
- Question on Inverted Page Table
- Multi-Level Paging
- Multi-level paging: Example1
- Multi-level paging: Example2
- Allocation of Frames
- Subject Mock
Proportional Share Scheduling
Proportional share schedulers operate by allocating T shares among all applications. An application can receive N shares of time, thus ensuring that the application will have N/T of the total processor time.
As an example, assume that a total of T = 100 shares is to be divided among three processes, A, B, and C. A is assigned 50 shares, B is assigned 15 shares, and C is assigned 20 shares. This scheme ensures that A will have 50 percent of the total processor time, B will have 15 percent, and C will have 20 percent.
Proportional share schedulers must work in conjunction with an admission-control policy to guarantee that an application receives its allocated shares of time. An admission-control policy will admit a client requesting a particular number of shares only if sufficient shares are available. In our current example, we have allocated 50 + 15 + 20 = 85 shares of the total of 100 shares. If a new process D requested 30 shares, the admission controller would deny D entry into the system.
